We don’t think this ended up being a full situation of escalation by others, and I also don’t think other people’s escalation would justify the accusations you add forth about lesbian erasure and lesbophobia in specific. Laura R. ended up being diplomatic. Queer Woman wasn’t aggressive.

They simply disagreed with you. Looking within the reviews actually leaves me personally because of the conclusion that you’re the main one who escalated the tone for this conversation. In very first remark you write “All females are bisexual by default?” which hit me personally as relatively hyperbolic. You have got extrapolated the possibly erroneous recognition of the one character that is gay imply that the list’s authors think each queer ladies are bisexual by standard. That’s super protective and unnecessary. And yes, it is obnoxious to select this battle during bi exposure and to make it very much a battle week. You might be the main one that has both accused Autostraddle along with other commenters of lesbian erasure/lesbophobia AND assumed that they’re accusing you of biphobia in change, but whom called you biphobic? Provided your responses about bi fandoms people that are attacking I wonder if perhaps you’ve carried throughout the power off their fandom fights into a context where it does not use.

We don’t assume that the lesbian would have a problem n’t with bi erasure because We myself have always been a lesbian who may have a issue with bi erasure. But if you can point to comments you’ve made here in which you object to bi erasure as aggressively and dramatically as this alleged case of lesbian erasure because you point the finger at bisexuals by singling out their fandoms for bad behaviour, that makes me wonder.

you are invited to show me personally incorrect by giving screenshots of a time whenever state, someone utilized ‘lesbian’ to spell it out Evan Rachel Wood’s fashion feeling and also you had been this indignant and protective about bi erasure.

We along with other those who called out of the addition of Waverly on this list had been literally called shitty by the individual you describe as diplomatic, that was the point when I stopped being good. Funny how you’re OK with this but need as any proof from me an evidence of my good will, expecting I’ll spend hours looking for and making screenshots of my words and upload it to some server just so you would say it doesn’t matter anyway because you don’t see it. Just like being called “shitty” is “diplomatic behavior” in this alt truth.

And that is exactly exactly just what angers me personally probably the most about any of it situation. Gaslighting and dual criteria. Calling away detailing as bisexual the type who’s very likely homosexual that way either just like name calling is diplomatic) and we shouldn’t have any problem because “who’s harmed by that” as she even used the word to describe herself is an attack on bisexual people now (that’s why I mentioned insinuation of biphobia by the way, but of course I bet you didn’t see it. Then your description this is certainly harmful because lesbian exposure is in extremely bad state of program contributes to accusation that dealing with lesbians is hi jacking bi exposure week. You probably don’t see any nagging issue for the reason that?

And another of the very most disingenuous arguments, we attempt to forbid bi fans from seeing Wav as bi because articles on a recognized site focused at queer ladies is simply the just like a viewpoint of an admirer! Except it is maybe perhaps not. When individuals see an impression they’ll be got by it it’s already formal. Which often can lead to huge stress on the article writers and showrunners to stick to that even if it is perhaps not whatever they planned, or they’ll face the fan wrath. And that is really shitty.

Because of the time you’re taking to argue that this really isn’t a grudge carried over from a bi/lesbian fandom war but really a basic argument from a person who is reasonable to any or all, i do believe it is significantly more than fair in my situation to inquire of one to straight straight back that claim up. You don’t need a screenshot, simply copy/paste something it’s from accusatory you’ve written re:bisexual erasure and link to the article.